<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angela Eagle MP: Tories have no coherent answers on the economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.labourmatters.com/the-labour-party/angela-eagle-mp-tories-have-no-coherent-answers-on-the-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.labourmatters.com/the-labour-party/angela-eagle-mp-tories-have-no-coherent-answers-on-the-economy/</link>
	<description>Labour news direct from the newsmakers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pp</title>
		<link>http://www.labourmatters.com/the-labour-party/angela-eagle-mp-tories-have-no-coherent-answers-on-the-economy/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>pp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labourmatters.com/?p=438#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Labour have had a decade to do precisely what they want - and this is where we have been led...

I am not going to comment on your use of &#039;incoherent&#039; - but if what we currently have is the alternative, then incoherence (as you put it) looks very attractive. Heck, even randomness couldn&#039;t be much worse, and would have been a heck of a lot cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour have had a decade to do precisely what they want &#8211; and this is where we have been led&#8230;</p>
<p>I am not going to comment on your use of &#8216;incoherent&#8217; &#8211; but if what we currently have is the alternative, then incoherence (as you put it) looks very attractive. Heck, even randomness couldn&#8217;t be much worse, and would have been a heck of a lot cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

